“It's no use talking about the 'Doomsday Clock'
when it has already chimed. But, alas, the chimes fell on deaf ears.”
Anthony T. Hincks, Author
The symbolic Doomsday Clock represents
the likelihood of a human-made global disaster. Maintained since 1947 by the
members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Science and Security Board, it
originally was an analogy for the threat of global nuclear war. But, since 2007
it has also included climate change and new developments in life sciences and
technology that could cause permanent harm to humanity.
The clock represents the
hypothetical global catastrophe as "midnight" and the Bulletin's opinion on how close the world is to a global
catastrophe as a number of minutes until midnight. Its original setting in 1947
was seven minutes to midnight. It has been set backward and forward 23 times
since then, the smallest-ever number of minutes to midnight being two (in 1953
and 2018) and the largest seventeen (in 1991).
The Doomsday Clock scenario is tailor-made
for the mental health field and specifically, the eating disorder industry. This
is particularly true for the following reasons:
(1). Private equity firms have
taken over residential treatment centers due to the passage of the Mental
Health Parity Act and the Affordable Care Act.
(2). There is a lack of
government oversight and no legislative guidelines in place to monitor or
regulate the industry.
(3). A prominent doctor in the
eating disorder industry testified while under oath that
there is a lack of empirical data on the effectiveness of residential treatment.
(4). Despite
the enactment of the Mental Health Parity Act, recent studies indicate insurance
providers are more closely evaluating and denying extended treatment at
residential programs.
(5). A high and
escalating debt/equity ratio indicating perceived growth is in actuality,
merely refinanced debt structure combined with a lack of tangible assets make
future transactions problematic if not doubtful and bankruptcy more likely.
(6). Loans and
debt payments exceeding in some instances over one hundred million dollars are
coming due and must be restructured or paid and if not, will result in
bankruptcy at the very least.
When taking
these issues into account, one can surmise that the delicate house of cards
upon which the residential treatment industry has been built is teetering and
we are approaching Midnight on the Mental Health Doomsday Clock.
And now, the first card has
fallen.
Private Equity investment led to … Bankruptcy
In 2018, HCR ManorCare, the
second largest nursing home chain in the United States, filed for bankruptcy.
In 2007, the Carlyle Group, one of the wealthiest private-equity firms in the
world acquired HCR ManorCare.
The Washington Post
conducted an investigation into HCR ManorCare and the Carlyle Group and
published an extensive article in November 2018. In the article, the Post noted
that the deal immediately faced protests from critics who said the aggressive
tactics of private-equity firms are ill suited for companies that tend to some
of society’s most vulnerable. From the start, Carlyle’s acquisition of HCR
ManorCare made the company’s finances more risky because the transaction
burdened it with billions in long-term debt.
Carlyle and investors then
exacerbated the financial situation by completing a 2011 financial deal that
extracted $1.3 billion from the company for investors while saddling HCR ManorCare
with what proved to be untenable financial obligations. Under the terms of that
deal, HCR ManorCare sold nearly all of the real estate in its nursing home
empire and then agreed to pay rent to the new owners. This kind of deal, known
as a sale-leaseback, is a common tactic of private-equity firms, and it
generated financial benefits for Carlyle and its investors. The rent HCR ManorCare
was obliged to pay — to occupy the nursing homes it had once owned — amounted
to $472 million annually, according to legal filings. The rent was set to
escalate at 3.5 percent a year, and according to the lease, HCR ManorCare also
had to pay for property taxes, insurance and upkeep at the homes.
Because of this 2011
transaction, HCR ManorCare’s long-term financial obligations had risen from
less than $1 billion to over $5 billion, according to financial statements. The
real estate deal yielded enough money to help the company pay down some of that
debt. But the deal also meant that HCR ManorCare had to make massive rent
payments to its new landlord, and these, according to the company’s accounting,
raised the company’s long-term financial obligations to $6 billion.
In addition, Carlyle
received annual “advisory fees” from the companies that it purchases —
essentially; Carlyle pays itself to manage the companies it owns. The Post
disclosed that at HCR ManorCare, those fees averaged about $3 million a year
from 2007 to 2015, or about $27 million, according to documents and interviews.
That money was also distributed to Carlyle and its investors.
Carlyle also received a
“transaction fee,” which is money Carlyle receives when it buys a company,
typically 1 percent (1%) of the purchase. The $6.1 billion HCR ManorCare
purchase price, yielded Carlyle $61 million, Carlyle officials confirmed. That
money was distributed to Carlyle and its investors.
The increasing financial
burden and long term debt obligations led to the inevitable deterioration of
the services it provided and the health conditions in the nursing homes.
Under the ownership of the
Carlyle Group, for the five years preceding the bankruptcy filing, HCR
ManorCare exposed its roughly 25,000 patients to increasing health risks,
according to inspection records analyzed and reported by The Post. “The number
of health-code violations found at the chain each year rose 26 percent between
2013 and 2017, according to a Post review of 230 of the chain’s retirement
homes.”
The Post quoted Andrew
Porch, a consultant on quality statistics to whom HCR ManorCare referred
questions about health-code violations, “Carlyle was a very interesting group
to deal with. They’re all bankers and investment people. We had some very tough
conversations where they did not know a thing about this business at all.”
The Post interviewed
financial experts familiar with HCR ManorCare who stated that it was massive
financial obligations that led the company to bankruptcy. The company had been
“over-levered” with debt. Chad Vanacore, vice president and research analyst of
health-care providers at Stifel, the investment bank stated, “I think it’s fair
to say they were over-levered.” Tom DeRosa, chief executive of Welltower, a company
that acquired HCR ManorCare’s real estate after the bankruptcy, said in an
interview at a real estate conference, “HCR ManorCare was doomed. It was
over-levered, and it couldn’t work under the capital structure that had been
crafted.”
And after the private
equity owners enrichened themselves, HCR ManorCare was left financially
devastated, picked apart in its bankruptcy and sold piecemeal while leaving a
trail of elderly who suffered and died as a result of the short-sightedness and
greed.
Is Acadia Healthcare Next?
We previously reported that Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. is
ripe for financial disaster. We previously reported that in a 7 year time
period, Acadia expanded its operations to a total of 584 behavioral health care
facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom and Puerto Rico with
approximately 17,800 beds. Of those 584 facilities, 256 allegedly treat eating
disorders in some fashion. Included amongst these 256 facilities are McCallum
Place, based in the State of Missouri and Timberline Knolls, based just outside
of Chicago, Illinois.
Acadia is now one of the largest mental health system providers in the United States. And according to Penn Little, the Managing Partner of Bar Nothin’ Capital Management based out of Chicago, Illinois it could be on the verge of financial collapse. Reports and rumors from last month were that Acadia was positioning itself to be sold to Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Company and then taken private. But these talks have stalled as reports of long term debt in the amount of $3.2 billion are come to light. Mr. Little’s research also found that many of the Acadia facilities are woefully understaffed. Further, Mr. Little reiterated that if interest rates climb, Acadia is approaching the point where it will be very difficult for it to pay its debt.
Other issues are conspiring against Acadia. Emily Evans, a health care director at Hedgeye Risk Management stated, “Acadia is also hurt by the fact that health insurance payments for mental health and addiction services are “bad” right now despite federal parity laws.”
As the sale to KKR looks ever more remote, Acadia stock plummeted
14%. Finally, of the greatest immediate concern to McCallum, Timberline Knolls
and other entities owned by Acadia, is that the Chief Executive Officer of Acadia, Joey Jacobs reportedly stated that he might prune ten percent (10%) or more of the lower performing
British centers by shutting them down. What that means is that with the stroke
of a pen, Mr. Jacobs and his board can shut down treatment centers if they do
not generate enough revenue. And the question remains, if that is the
inevitable action, how many people will die because they happen to be in a treatment
center that does not financially perform to Mr. Jacobs’ satisfaction?
And Finally …
As we stare at the possible
financial apocalypse, we must be reminded of the debt we know
Eating Recovery Center has incurred: $30 million senior
secured revolving credit facility expiring in 2022; a $190 million senior
secured first lien term loan due in 2024, and; a $30 million senior secured
delayed draw term loan due in 2024. You may add management/advisory fees
being paid to CCMP Capital Advisors and transaction fees to its equation. ERC’s
Doomsday Clock has a definite midnight date and the results will be far worse
than a glass slipper being lost.
The reality and the
horrible ramifications of having private equity own the eating disorder
industry, from the halls of the treatment centers to the halls of Congress have
arrived. Our children are dying. Our loved ones still suffering are subjected
to vood00-based treatment with no roots based in objective, scientific
research. Treatment is monetary based. An incompetent practitioner who sexually
took advantage of a patient is allowed to continue to practice with no tangible
ramifications. Hundreds of people suffering from this insidious disease are
kicked out of outpatient treatment on a concocted, bogus excuse while
spokespersons for that treatment center try to spin the reality of their
reprehensible conduct.
And so parents, it
is up to you. Your children’s lives depend on you. You must not back down nor
let fear dictate your course. Arm yourself with facts and be bold. Embrace the message of Admiral William
McRaven, who in a commencement speech given at the University of Texas said
these powerful words, “So, if you want to change the world, start each day with
a task completed. Find someone to help you through life. Respect everyone. Know
that life is not fair and you will fail often. But if you take some risks, step
up when the times are the toughest, face down the bullies, lift up the
downtrodden, and never ever give up, if you do these things, the next
generation and the generations that follow will live in a world far better than
the one we have today. And what started here, will indeed have changed the
world for the better.”
Change the world.
Excellent article that unfortunately has confirmed some of my own fears and suspicions. I agree that families and parents have to be extremely well informed about the realities of treatment.
ReplyDeleteWe have seen this repeatedly where Institutions and outpatient practitioners are not equipped to treat those suffering with eating disorders when professing to have expertise. Without family advocating for their children and EDucating themselves about what real treatment is, those children are vulnerable to horrific damage - losing their souls and their lives. You are a champion to educate other families about the reality of the eating disorder treatment world, which is Big Business and is driven by the all mighty dollar. I stand behind you to fight for change.
ReplyDeleteThe flaws with residential treatment for anorexia nervosa are too numerous to mention. One is that people treated in a residential setting become experts in eating in a controlled environment, but then struggle to eat normally in the outside world. Another is that people who leave the real world for residential treatment lose contact with friends, family, school, work, and normal social support. After discharge, they struggle to reintegrate into normal society, much like people who are released from prison. Yet another flaw in the system is that it is not healthy for people with restrictive eating disorders and those with purging or bingeing disorders to live together 24 hours a day. Their symptoms should be treated in different ways, not treated the same, and there is a significant risk of behaviors crossing over from one group to the other. I could go on, but these are a few of the problems with the concept of residential treatment. There is no way these problems can be resolved, other than by avoiding the residential treatment model altogether.
ReplyDelete