If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be
called research, would it?
Albert
Einstein
I believe in innovation and that the way you get
innovation is you fund research and you learn the basic facts.
Bill
Gates
The most recent edition of the Journal of
Biological Psychiatry just published the most comprehensive research study ever conducted on eating disorders. It is significant that the research findings took into account the most recent version of the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition which was published in 2013. The DSM-V
varied the definitions of eating disorders and was more authoritative and
inclusive of the symptomology.
The research study was based on
extensive interviews of 36,309 adults which was by far the most broad, far reaching
study ever conducted with regard to eating disorders. The methodology and
measurement techniques were designed to eliminate as many false variables as
possible. For each Eating Disorder diagnosis, weighted means,
medians, and frequencies were computed for age, BMI, age of onset, years with
episode, persistence of ED, and ED-related impairment; analysis of covariance
was used to examine whether current age, current BMI, age of onset, and years
with episodes differed between AN, BN, and BED after adjusting for
sociodemographic variables.
The analysis of the raw
statistics, findings and results support the belief and speculation held by
most experienced practitioners in the ED field.
General
Findings
The general findings of the study estimate that 0.80 percent of US adults will be affected by anorexia nervosa in
their lifetime; 0.28 percent will be affected by bulimia nervosa; and 0.85
percent will be affected by binge eating disorder. To translate these
percentages to raw numbers, using the estimated current US population of
325,000,000 reveals the following:
1.
2,600,000 US adults will suffer
from anorexia nervosa;
2.
910,000 US adults will suffer from bulimia
nervosa;
3.
2,762,500 US adults will suffer from binge eating
disorders.
It is unknown to what extent the
numbers for bulimia and binge eating disorders overlap. But, the two most
important conclusions that can be drawn from this report are:
1. Eating disorders are far more prevalent than earlier
estimates, especially when one considers the second point;
2. This study only involved adults 18 years old and
older. It did not take into account our children who, every study has shown
suffer from this disease on a higher percentage than adults.
Tomoko Udo, PhD, of University at
Albany, New York who conducted the study alongside Carlos Grilo, PhD, of Yale
University School of Medicine stated: "Our study confirms that eating
disorders are common, are found in both men and women and across ethnic/racial
groups, occur throughout the lifespan, and are associated with impairments in
psychosocial functioning."
John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry, stated: "The
prevalence and impact of eating disorders continues to be underestimated in
society. This definitive study should guide both research and policy
development."
Findings
Taking Into Account Various Factors
The study also took into account
various factors and drew conclusions based upon those factors. The study
indicated:
“Adjusting for age, race and/or
ethnicity, education, and income categories, odds of lifetime and 12-month diagnoses
of all three EDs were significantly greater for women than men, particularly
for AN and BN.”
“We also found that:
1) the risk of lifetime AN
diagnosis was significantly lower for Hispanic and non-Hispanic black
respondents than for non-Hispanic white respondents;
2) the risks of lifetime and
12-month BN diagnoses did not differ significantly by race and/or ethnicity;
3) the risk of lifetime BED but
not 12-month BED diagnosis was significantly lower for non-Hispanic black than
non-Hispanic white respondents;
4) the risks of lifetime and
12-month BED diagnoses for Hispanic and non-Hispanic white respondents did not
differ significantly; and
5) the risk of lifetime AN
diagnosis was associated with higher income.”
“Overall, it is important to
recognize that EDs occur across all ethnic/racial groups and that the rates for
some diagnoses (e.g., BN and BED to a lesser extent) are comparable across
groups. However, 12-month AN diagnosis was most prevalent among non-Hispanic
white respondents, women, and respondents 18 to 29 years of age. The findings
are broadly consistent with previous DSM-IV–defined EDs in their analysis of
24,124 adult respondents from the World Health Organization World Mental Health
Survey, reported roughly comparable prevalence estimates for BN and BED
diagnoses across 14 countries.”
“Collectively, such findings
highlight the importance of actively considering all forms of diversity across
prevention and intervention clinical and/or research work, which to date
appears to be at odds with our findings.”
“Findings regarding the mean
ages of onset for AN, BN, and BED were
ages 19.3, 20.0, and 24.5 years, respectively.”
“The chronic nature of EDs was
suggested by long illness durations and rates of 12-month persistence, which
highlight the importance of early recognition and intervention.”
The
Study’s Conclusions
“Our findings for DSM-5–defined
EDs, based on the largest national sample of U.S. adults studied to date,
indicate these are prevalent disorders distributed across age groups, across
both men and women, and across different ethnic and/or racial groups. Although
substantial differences between EDs exist, overall, they appear to be
persistent and associated with substantial rates of impairment in psychosocial
functioning. EDs show differential associations with obesity, and our findings
highlight substantial associations between BED and extreme obesity. Thus, our
findings indicate that DSM-5– defined EDs represent an important public health
problem.”
Post Script
Ordinarily, at this point in
most of the articles I have written, I would end with a pithy remark, a
challenge to some group or an outpouring of emotion.
In this case, the very disturbing findings and conclusions of this
study stand alone.
And as our loved ones continue to be treated as mere corporate commodities, to be disposed of and discarded in the name of profits and skewed EBITDA numbers, one cannot help but wonder when the "carousel of death" fueled by private equity firms and insurance entities will slow down.
And as our loved ones continue to be treated as mere corporate commodities, to be disposed of and discarded in the name of profits and skewed EBITDA numbers, one cannot help but wonder when the "carousel of death" fueled by private equity firms and insurance entities will slow down.
No comments:
Post a Comment